STARKS v. HOSPITAL SERVICE PLAN OF N.J, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Richard L. Plotkin argued the cause for appellants ( Pitney, Hardin, Kipp Szuch and Vanderbilt Siegel, attorneys; Richard L. Plotkin and Jeri E. Ruscoll, on the briefs). Harold Krieger argued the cause for respondents ( Krieger, Ferrara, Feinsilver, Flynn and Catalina, attorneys; Harold Krieger and Joseph J. Ferrara, on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Richard L. Plotkin argued the cause for appellants ( Pitney, Hardin, Kipp Szuch and Vanderbilt Siegel, attorneys; Richard L. Plotkin and Jeri E. Ruscoll, on the briefs). Harold Krieger argued the cause for respondents ( Krieger, Ferrara, Feinsilver, Flynn and Catalina, attorneys; Harold Krieger and Joseph J. Ferrara, on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ALICE STARKS, AN INDIVIDUAL; JULIUS KAY, AN INDIVIDUAL; BARBARA ROCAFUERTE,AN INDIVIDUAL; UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL464, AFL-CIO, AMALGAMATED WELFARE FUND, A TRUST; AND ALL PRESENT AND FUTUREMEMBERS OF THE CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOSPITAL SERVICE PLAN OFN.J., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; AND MEDICAL-SURGICAL PLAN OF N.J.,INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 182 N.J. Super. 342 (1981).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN — 6.

For reversal — none.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.