Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WOLFE v GENO

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought this paternity action against defendant on March 3, 1981, on behalf of her child, who was born on February 2, 1973. Defendant denied paternity and moved for accelerated judgment, raising the six-year statute of limitations, MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b). Following a hearing, the trial court granted defendant's motion and dismissed plaintiff's action. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

We reject plaintiff's argument that the limitation period of the paternity act, six years, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the state and federal constitutions. Shifter v Wolf, 120 Mich. App. 182; 327 N.W.2d 429 (1982).

Further, under the clear language of the statute, an acknowledgment of paternity by a defendant must be "in writing" in order to toll the running of the limitation period. MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOLFE v. GENO
(Dec 21, 1982)