AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

HELEN SHAW et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF AUBURN, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs have recovered a verdict for damages sustained as a result of an accident occurring when plaintiff Helen Shaw tripped on a depressed manhole located in an Auburn city street and fractured a bone in her foot. There was no evidence that the defect was caused by the municipality and thus, compliance with the prior written notice provision of section 157 of the Auburn Municipal Code was an essential element of plaintiffs' causes of action. Since they failed to either plead or prove compliance with the code's notice provisions, defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted (see Doremus v Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook, 18 N.Y.2d 362, 365; MacMullen v City of Middletown, 187 N.Y. 37; Fullerton v City of Schenectady, 285 App. Div. 545, affd 309 N.Y. 701, app dsmd 350 U.S. 980; Deacon v City of Buffalo, 29 A.D.2d 620; see, also, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 3015, subd [a], p 58).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHAW v. CITY OF AUBURN
(Dec 17, 1982)