AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MATTHEW TOBIN et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD A. RUSKIN et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gammerman, J.), entered April 2, 1982, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, defendants-appellants' motion for a hearing pursuant to section 148-a Jud. of the Judiciary Law before a medical malpractice panel granted, that hearing to be held before trial, without costs. The crux of this case hinges, not on the credibility of the parties, but on whether defendants-appellants were negligent in failing to diagnose the malignancy timely. Medical issues exist which warrant panel review. (See Rosa v Kulkarni, 89 A.D.2d 529; Gold v Hershey, 90 A.D.2d 704.)

Concur — Ross, J.P., Asch, Markewich, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOBIN v. RUSKIN
(Dec 23, 1982)