Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ENRIQUE ACOSTA, APPELLANT, v. LOUISE ACOSTA, APPELLEE.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

By virtue both of the controlling and unanimous cases, e.g., Erspan v. Badgett, 659 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 1443, 71 L.Ed.2d 658 (1982) and a subsequently enacted statute, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408(c)(1) (1982), the Supreme Court decision in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981) may not be retroactively applied. We therefore reject the appellant's primary contention. His other points merit neither reversal nor discussion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ACOSTA v. ACOSTA
(Feb 1, 1983)