AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division correctly held that the commission did not have the authority, under subdivision 2 of section 113 of the Public Service Law, to order the petitioner to pass on to its customers the tax deduction resulting from its passing on of a tax refund. We express no opinion on whether the commission, in ruling on a general rate case, may order a passing on of the tax deduction, a question we need not reach on this appeal.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ROCHESTER TEL. CORP. v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM
(Feb 10, 1983)