Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SMITH, Appellant, v. TERMINAL TRANSFER, INC., Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The question in this personal injury case is whether the trial court erred in not giving three Uniform Jury Instructions requested by plaintiff. The portion of the record before us on appeal does not contain a transcript of the portion of the proceedings in which the trial court instructed the jury. Therefore, we cannot tell what instructions were given and what instructions were not, or whether those requested and refused were covered by those that were given. When an appellant does not designate a record that is adequate for review, we must affirm the judgment appealed from if the pleadings are sufficient to support it. Reeder v. Kay, 276 Or. 1111, 557 P.2d 673 (1976); H.N.M. Enterprises, Inc. v. Hamilton, 49 Or. App. 613, 621 P.2d 57 (1980).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. TERMINAL TRANSFER
(Feb 16, 1983)