AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

WALTER STAUBI et al., Respondents, v. WALTER J. HASSELMAN, SR., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) WALTER STAUBI et al., Respondents,

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Slifkin, J.), entered February 1, 1982, which denied an unopposed motion to consolidate two actions. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted. As both actions clearly involve similar issues of fact and law, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny consolidation, notwithstanding the movants' failure to comply with the rules of practice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (22 NYCRR 780.21). Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STAUBI v. HASSELMAN
(Mar 14, 1983)