Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of MICHAEL J. GOLDEN et al., Respondents, v. JAMES H. TULLY, JR., et al., Constituting the New York State Tax Commission, Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In response to the taxpayers' demand for a bill of particulars, it was admitted that petitioners' nonresidence in "New York State was determinative of the disallowance of said moving expenses." No other rationale was then proffered to justify the discrepancy in treating residents and nonresidents. Consequently, it must be concluded that, in the present matter, respondent's determination unconstitutionally discriminated against the nonresident taxpayers (see US Const, art IV, § 2, cl 1).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GOLDEN v. TULLY
(Mar 29, 1983)