Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BOOKER T. HILLERY, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. RUTH L. RUSHEN, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

ORDER

This is an appeal from an interim award of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for services performed in obtaining a permanent injunction. Plaintiffs' claims for damages are pending in the district court.

Plaintiffs move for dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion is granted. An interim award of attorney's fees is not a collateral order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Hastings v. Maine-Endwell Central School District, 676 F.2d 893 (2d Cir. 1982); Ruiz v. Estelle, 609 F.2d 118 (5th Cir. 1980). Cf. Hain Pure Food Co. v. Sona Food Products Co., 618 F.2d 521 (9th Cir. 1980) (per curiam). Appellants' distinction between fees awarded in connection with a permanent injunction and a preliminary injunction as in Hastings is without significance.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILLERY v. RUSHEN
(Apr 1, 1983)