Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RICHARD DESCHAMPS, APPELLANT, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND ALEXANDA STEFANIW, CHARLES THORNBURGH AND NANCY THORNBURGH, INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A THE RAMADA INN, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of appellees/third party defendants, Charles and Nancy Thornburgh, owners of the Key West Ramada Inn. Alexanda Stefaniw, a guest at the Ramada, was involved in an automobile accident with Richard Deschamps while attempting to exit the motel's driveway. Plaintiff, Deschamps, sued Stefaniw and Hertz Corporation, owner of the car Stefaniw was driving, in an action grounded in negligence. The defendants then impleaded the Thornburghs as third party defendants alleging that they failed to maintain their property in a safe condition in that unnatural shrubbery was positioned so as to obstruct the view of Stefaniw as he attempted to exit. Furthermore, the defendants alleged that the Thornburghs violated certain county and municipal ordinances. Plaintiff, Deschamps, also filed a direct action against the Thornburghs as defendants. The defendants/third party defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings contending there was no legal liability on their part to any of the parties. The trial court granted this motion and this appeal follows.

Although we affirm the trial court's determination that the county and municipal ordinances were inapplicable to this case, we are compelled to reverse its decision on the remainder of the complaint. We hold that the plaintiff and the defendants stated a cause of action in their respective complaints against the Thornburghs. See Cook v. Martin, 330 So.2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

LETTS, C.J., and BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DESCHAMPS v. HERTZ CORP
(Apr 6, 1983)