Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

ANTE KURTIN, Appellant, v. CATING ROPE WORKS, INC., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for review of the facts (see Miskiewicz v Hartley Rest. Corp., 58 N.Y.2d 963; CPLR 5613).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KURTIN v. CATING ROPE WORKS, INC
(Apr 26, 1983)