Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of LILLIAN LISS, Appellant, v. ANTHONY SADOWSKI et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Appellant filed designating petitions for a seat on the school board of Community School District No. 15 in Brooklyn. On a number of petitions, sufficient to affect the validity of appellant's candidacy, the subscribing witness transposed the numbers of his election district and his assembly district. This defect is fatal. The provisions of the Election Law governing the nomination of candidates apply to the election of community school board members (see Education Law, § 2590-c, subd 6, par [31]). It is established that the requirement of subdivision 1 of section 6-140 of the Election Law that the subscribing witnesses set forth their election and assembly districts on designating petitions is to be strictly enforced (see Matter of Higby v Mahoney, 48 N.Y.2d 15).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur; Judge FUCHSBERG taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LISS v. SADOWSKI
(Apr 27, 1983)