Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF TONYA RENEE RUMLEY AND GARY DEAN RUMLEY, SHERRY HUTCHENS DOBZENSKI, PETITIONER v. EDWARD R. INMAN, DIRECTOR ALAMANCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; ROBIN PEACOCK, SUPERVISOR OF ADOPTIONS, DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; BOBBY RAY RUMLEY, AND WIFE, VICTORIA RUMLEY, RESPONDENTS

Appeal and Error 28.1 — failure to except to findings of fact and conclusions — judgment affirmed In an appeal from orders denying plaintiffs motion for an order requiring the opening of an adoption record where plaintiff failed to except to the findings of fact and conclusions drawn to support the judgment, the judgment is affirmed.

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from orders denying plaintiff's motion for an order requiring the opening of an adoption record.

The only exceptions brought forward are to the signing of the order. These exceptions only bring forward the question of whether the facts found and conclusions drawn support the judgment. Rule 10 (a), Rules of Appellate Procedure. The questions of whether the findings of fact are supported by the evidence and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law are not presented. Furthermore, there is no exception to the failure of the court to make the positive findings that would have been essential to an order granting the relief sought. For example, there must be a finding of fact that the information sought to be revealed is necessary for the best interest of the child or the public before an order can be entered requiring disclosure of the information. In re Spinks, 32 N.C. App. 422, 232 S.E.2d 479 (1977). The order contains no such finding.

Affirmed.

Judges HEDRICK and ARNOLD concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE RUMLEY v. INMAN
(May 1, 1983)