Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY G. JONES, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM R. JONES, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals several of the financial aspects and property distribution awards fashioned by the trial judge in the judgment which dissolved the brief marriage of the parties. We are required to review the judgment as a whole, and not the separate remedies used by the trial judge to achieve equity between the parties. Based on our review of the record we find that the trial judge did not abuse the broad discretion accorded trial judges by Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Therefore, we affirm.

OTT, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JONES v. JONES
(May 20, 1983)