AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES VAN ETTEN, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed and defendant remanded to Supreme Court, Erie County, for resentencing. Memorandum: Defendant's conviction of grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law, § 155.35) cannot be sustained because the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of stolen jewelry exceeded $1,500. Market value or replacement cost, not original cost of the stolen property, is required to sustain a larceny conviction (Penal Law, § 155.20, subd 1; People v Harold, 22 N.Y.2d 443, 445). Defendant's contention that the trial court failed preliminarily to instruct the jury pursuant to CPL 270.40 was not preserved for review ( People v Robinson, 36 N.Y.2d 224, 228; CPL 470.05, subd 2) and is harmless error. The judgment is modified by reducing defendant's conviction for grand larceny in the second degree to the lesser included crime of petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.20, subd 4).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. VAN ETTEN
(May 25, 1983)