Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LEO PROVOSTY et al., Appellants, v. LYDIA E. HALL HOSPITAL, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And Another Action.)

On review of the submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, insofar as it dismissed the complaint in Action No. 1 for the reasons stated with respect to Action No. 1 in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 A.D.2d 658).

Appeal, insofar as taken from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as denied plaintiffs' cross motion, inter alia, to strike the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations in Action No. 2, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PROVOSTY v. HALL HOSPITAL
(Jun 7, 1983)