Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Indefinite suspension — Neglect of matters entrusted to attorney — Statute of limitations allowed to run barring clients' claims — Professional services not performed although fee accepted — Correspondence manufactured after the fact — Prior public reprimand.
Per Curiam.
After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3).
It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
CELEBREZZE, C.J., W. BROWN, SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN and J.P. CELEBREZZE, JJ., concur.