AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN C. BAUMAN, Claimant, v. CHILI FURNITURE APPLIANCES, INC., et al., Respondents, and SPECIAL FUND FOR REOPENED CASES, Appellant. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Workers' Compensation Board reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice T. PAUL KANE at the Appellate Division ( 92 A.D.2d 974, 976).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BAUMAN v. CHILI FURNITURE APPLIANCES
(Jun 9, 1983)