AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

R.C. HILTON ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STAN MUSIAL AND BIGGIE'S, INC., SUNCOAST INTERNATIONAL INNS, LTD., EDWARD J. STERN, MARIEMONT INVESTMENT, E.J. STERN, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING [2] (Opinion April 11, 1983, 11 Cir., 1983, 702 F.2d 907)

PER CURIAM:

R.C. Hilton Associates, Inc. requests a rehearing based on the contention that this court's treatment of its claim for tortious interference with a business relationship, see 702 F.2d 907 (11th Cir. 1983), is inconsistent with Florida law. In our earlier opinion we did not intend to imply that an enforceable contract between plaintiff and a third party is an essential element of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship. Hilton's claim fails because he did not establish the existence of an advantageous relationship with Stan Musial and Biggie's, Inc.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

R.C. HILTON ASSOC. v. STAN MUSIAL BIGGIE'S
(Jun 9, 1983)