Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE J. SHAMAS, MICHAEL J. SHAMAS, AND REBECCA KREED SHAMAS, APPELLANTS, v. DORTHEA E. RITTER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HELEN V. CURRY, DECEASED AND JOSEPH F. JENNINGS, GUARDIAN AND LITEM OF JOSEPH COLEY RITTER, A MINOR BENEFICIARY, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court's findings that appellee overcame the presumption of undue influence by coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in the testatrix's affairs, especially in the preparation of a new will, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and thus, will not be disturbed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971); In re Estate of Blakey, 363 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHAMAS v. RITTER
(Jun 15, 1983)