Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL SANCHEZ AND FRANCISCO ARMENDARIS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion, March 15, 1983, 11th Cir., 1983, 703 F.2d 580)

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing, insofar as the same is addressed to the panel, is DENIED. A review of the record and the briefs, along with statements made by counsel during oral argument, convinces us that it would have been absolutely futile for the appellees to have raised a claim of duress or coercion in the administrative proceedings.

Rule 26(F) of our Local Rules provides that, "A suggestion for rehearing en banc will also be treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ
(Jun 16, 1983)