AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

MORRIS ATKIN et al., Respondents, v. UNION PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And Another Action.)

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice REID S. MOULE ( 90 A.D.2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATKIN v. UNION PROCESSING CORPORATION
(Jun 28, 1983)