Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LUCILLE M. SCARBOROUGH et al., Appellants, v. DAVID S. ZIMMON et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In this case the Appellate Division did not reverse the order of Special Term as a matter of law, but rather in the exercise of its own discretion as a substitute for that of Special Term. That it was authorized to do, and we cannot conclude that in so doing it erred as a matter of law ( Scarborough v Zimmon, 56 N.Y.2d 784).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCARBOROUGH v. ZIMMON
(Jun 30, 1983)