AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE IGLESIA, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered May 12, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No questions of facts have been raised or considered. The court's refusal to instruct the jury, as requested, on the issue of the voluntariness of the defendant's statements, as required by CPL 710.70 (subd 3), necessitates a new trial (see People v Graham, 55 N.Y.2d 144 ; People v Gibson, 89 A.D.2d 859). The error may not be regarded as harmless, as the statute is mandatory in its direction and the court's refusal to so charge deprived the jury of any instructions regarding the standards by which to evaluate the defendant's claim that the statements in issue had been coerced. Thompson, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. IGLESIA
(Jul 5, 1983)