AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GERALD G. WRIGHT et al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

In a personal injury action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered July 13, 1983, which denied their motion to reargue. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs claim that their motion was in fact a motion to renew. However, they concede that there were no new or additional facts presented in their moving papers since the record before Special Term on the prior motion contained their "additional facts". Therefore, the motion was in fact a motion to reargue and no appeal lies from the denial of such a motion (see Klatz v Armor Elevator Co., 93 A.D.2d 633). Damiani, J.P., Mangano, O'Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WRIGHT v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
(Jul 5, 1983)