AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CHARLES M. SCIASCIA et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, and WALDBAUM'S INC. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.)

Appeal by defendant City of New York from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated February 26, 1982, which directed it to produce and make available to all parties the entire investigatory file prepared by the fire marshal's office in connection with the fire in question. Order affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiffs-respondents and respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The City of New York has failed to demonstrate that the materials sought for discovery are exempt under either CPLR 3101 (subd [g]) or section 87 (subd 2, par [g]) of the Public Officers Law (see Matter of Polansky v Regan, 81 A.D.2d 102; Pataki v Kiseda, 80 A.D.2d 100). Titone, J.P., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCIASCIA v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Aug 22, 1983)