AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of NEBRASKA BRACE, Respondent, v. GEORGE P. SCARINGE et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Albany County, Respondents, and JAMES H. BOULDIN, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cobb, J.), entered August 19, 1983 in Albany County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to section 16-102 Elec. of the Election Law, to declare invalid the designating petition naming respondent James H. Bouldin as a Democratic Party candidate for the office of Albany County Legislator, Third Legislative District, in the September 13, 1983 primary election. In our view, Special Term properly held that the statutory provisions regarding the contents of a designating petition's cover sheet (Election Law, § 6-134, subd 2) are mandatory and are to be strictly enforced ( Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 N.Y.2d 772, 773-774). The cover sheet submitted with the designating petition of respondent James Bouldin failed to list any residence address for the candidate and also failed to indicate the total number of signatures contained in the petition (see Election Law, § 6-134, subd 2). Unlike the situation presented in Matter of Amalfitano v Sadowski ( 51 N.Y.2d 719, affg 77 A.D.2d 930), wherein the alleged irregularities appearing on the cover sheet of the designating petition did not involve the information required to be present by statute, the omissions on respondent Bouldin's cover sheet involve mandated information. In the absence of strict compliance with subdivision 2 of section 6-134 Elec. of the Election Law, Special Term correctly invalidated the designating petition. The constitutionality of subdivision 2 of section 6-134 Elec. of the Election Law is also challenged on this appeal. Respondent Bouldin contends that if the statute is construed as requiring strict compliance therewith, it impermissibly violates the fundamental constitutional rights to vote and stand for elected public office. We need not consider this issue, however, since it was not raised in the court below ( Wein v Levitt, 42 N.Y.2d 300, 306; E.J. Eddy, Inc. v Fidelity Deposit Co. of Md., 265 N.Y. 276; 20 N.Y. Jur 2d, Constitutional Law, § 49, p 105). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BRACE v. SCARINGE
(Aug 25, 1983)