Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of Martin Andrew Akins, a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF COOS COUNTY, Respondent, v. AKINS, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The juvenile was found to be within the jurisdiction of the court on the basis of activities which would constitute a crime if committed by an adult. The dispositional order required him to make restitution to the victims. He contends, on appeal, that ORS 419.507(1)(a) is unconstitutional and that the court did not make adequate findings regarding his ability to pay restitution. The juvenile made no objection to the dispositional order and did not raise the issue he now raises on appeal. We decline to consider the merits of these contentions, because they were not preserved by appropriate objections in the trial court. State v. Dillon, 292 Or. 172, 637 P.2d 602 (1981); State v. Deloge, 55 Or. App. 742, 639 P.2d 1293 (1982); State v. Lake, 49 Or. App. 505, 619 P.2d 1332 (1980), rev den 290 Or. 519 (1981).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. AKINS
(Sep 21, 1983)