AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

PEARLINA INNIS et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.

The determination of an application to file a late claim pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 CTC of the Court of Claims Act is within the discretion of the court below. ( Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Employees' Retirement System, 55 N.Y.2d 979, 981.) Absent an abuse of discretion, not present here, that determination is nonreviewable by this court. (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], pp 353-354, 368-369.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEARLINA INNIS v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Sep 20, 1983)