Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MAUREEN HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN B. HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the district court, 564 F. Supp. 1146, that the Feres doctrine bars this action. Under the facts, we cannot recognize a duty to follow up because this would mean creating continuous onsets of new causes of action extending beyond the period of active service.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES
(Sep 22, 1983)