Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRAZO v. COX. KRYSTAL COMPANY

PER CURIAM.

After plenary consideration of this matter, we find that Division 1 of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the judgment rendered thereon, Cox v. Brazo, 165 Ga. App. 888 (1) ( 303 S.E.2d 71) (1983), are correct and should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., and Clarke, J., who dissent.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1983 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 18, 1983.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRAZO v. COX
(Sep 22, 1983)