Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF LOUISIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. FREDERICK DOUGLAS JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LABORDE, Judge.

Defendant, Frederick Douglas Johnson, was charged with eight counts of forgery by bill of information. LSA-R.S. 14:72. After trial by a six member jury, the defendant was found guilty as charged on all counts and sentenced to serve nine years on each count. The court expressly directed that the sentences be served concurrently with each other. On appeal, defendant relies on five assignments of error for reversal of his convictions and sentences. We affirm.

In this case, neither the appellant nor the appellee filed briefs. For this reason the assignments of error designated by the defendant in the record are considered as abandoned. State v. Lemoine, 403 So.2d 1230 (La. 1981); State v. Dewey, 408 So.2d 1255 (La. 1982).

Under these circumstances the court's review is limited to a "mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings" to determine if any patent errors are present. LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2).

LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920.
Scope of Appellate of Review. The following matters and no others shall be considered on appeal:
(1) An error designated in the assignment of errors, and;
(2) An error that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence.


After a thorough review of the record, we find no patent errors.

For these reasons, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. JOHNSON
(Oct 12, 1983)