Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. DANIEL C. CAMPBELL, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order granting Campbell's motion to suppress evidence. The officer (a wildlife officer with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission) who stopped and detained Campbell and his vehicle did not have sufficient information that criminal activity was afoot to justify a brief investigatory stop. United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). Nor did Campbell's operation of his vehicle justify the officer's stopping Campbell for a traffic offense. Brown v. State, 62 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1953); Bailey v. State, 319 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1975); compare State v. Turner, 345 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CAMPBELL
(Oct 13, 1983)