AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC OF AMERICA, INC., A TENNESSEE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INSTROMEDIX, INC., AN OREGON CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir. 1983) is withdrawn.

Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC v. INSTROMEDIX
(Oct 20, 1983)