Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROSS v. THE STATE.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. Held:

Only slight evidence of a violation of the terms and conditions of probation is necessary to revoke a probated sentence. The quality or quantity necessary for revocation is not that demanded for conviction of a crime. See Green v. State, 158 Ga. App. 864, 865 ( 282 S.E.2d 417). See also Johnson v. State, 240 Ga. 526, 527 ( 242 S.E.2d 53), affirming s.c. 142 Ga. App. 124 ( 235 S.E.2d 550). The evidence was sufficient to support the revocation of defendant's probation. See State v. Brinson, 248 Ga. 380 ( 283 S.E.2d 463); Lynch v. State, 158 Ga. App. 232, 233 ( 279 S.E.2d 537); Mobley v. State, 158 Ga. App. 508 ( 281 S.E.2d 277).

Judgment affirmed. Shulman, C. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1983.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSS v. STATE
(Oct 20, 1983)