Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice DAVID ROSS at the Appellate Division ( 94 A.D.2d 483). We would only add that in the circumstances of this case, we are satisfied that the draft environmental impact statement did provide an adequate basis for public consideration of density impact. (Cf. Webster Assoc. v Town of Webster, 59 N.Y.2d 220; Matter of Concerned Citizens Against Crossgates v Flacke, 58 N.Y.2d 919, affg 89 A.D.2d 759, 761.)
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge WACHTLER.