Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of BERNARD C. LUCCHESE et al., Respondents, v. PHILIP J. ROTELLA et al., Appellants, and HELENA M. DONOHUE et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for those reasons set forth in the memorandum of the Appellate Division which relate to the failure to abide by the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 6-108 of the Election Law.

While we do not address the appropriateness or propriety of instituting this proceeding in Albany County rather than in Rockland County where the controversy arose, we do not condone the practice.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LUCCHESE v. ROTELLA
(Oct 28, 1983)