AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOE BENHAM, TERRY E. ANTHONY AND WOODROW BIDDLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. JOE EDWARDS AND JOHN R. BRANNING, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment heretofore entered in this case, 678 F.2d 511, having been vacated by the Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3565, 77 L.Ed.2d 1406, and the case having been remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3043, 77 L.Ed.2d 694 (1983), and the parties' post-remand briefs having been considered, the case is now REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the decision and opinion of the Supreme Court in Jones v. United States.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BENHAM v. EDWARDS
(Nov 3, 1983)