AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARIA ANTOINETA PLASENCIA, PETITIONER, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

This court has reviewed the briefs filed by the parties in the light of the Supreme Court's holding that the respondent was entitled to due process as a permanent resident alien and the Supreme Court's remand to determine whether due process was accorded under all the circumstances. See Landon v. Plasencia, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 321, 332, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982). We conclude that the case should be remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's opinion.

It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PLASENCIA, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, I.N.S
(Nov 7, 1983)