Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

TIRETH S. SANDHU, Respondent, v. MANMOHAN SANDHU, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There was no error of law in the conclusion reached by both courts below that cruel and inhuman treatment has been sufficiently demonstrated to satisfy the requirement of subdivision (1) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law ( Hessen v Hessen, 33 N.Y.2d 406, 411). In balancing the several factors to be considered on this record, the courts were not bound to deny relief to plaintiff husband because of the duration of the marriage and defendant wife's lack of demonstrated ability to support herself.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SANDHU v. SANDHU
(Nov 22, 1983)