AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

M.I.F. SECURITIES COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. R.C. STAMM Co., Appellant.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN at the Appellate Division ( 94 A.D.2d 211) except so much thereof as holds that the individual members of Stamm partnership may not demand arbitration between MIF and Stamm partnership, an issue which we deem it unnecessary to reach or consider.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

M.I.F. SECURITIES COMPANY v. R.C. STAMM CO
(Nov 29, 1983)