AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IRVIN H. HILLIARD, PETITIONER, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board affirming petitioner's removal arises from a "mixed" case and is, therefore, not within this court's jurisdiction to review. Williams v. Department of the Army, 715 F.2d 1485 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

Because the pleadings before the district court allege discrimination and do not track the issues of this appeal, it is in the interest of justice that we transfer this case to the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILLIARD v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
(Dec 6, 1983)