AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

RICARDO MONTALVO, Appellant, v. KEY INDUSTRIES, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendant. SUPERHARM CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

In a personal injury action, plaintiff appeals (1) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (De Luca, J.), dated September 13, 1982, as granted, without opposition, defendant and third-party plaintiff Key Industries' and third-party defendant Superharm Corp.'s motions for orders of preclusion, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated June 3, 1983, which denied his motion for reargument. Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and without prejudice to an application at Special Term for leave to vacate the default. A party may not appeal from an order entered upon his default, the proper remedy being an application to vacate the default, made to the court which issued the order ( Boylan v. Health Ins. Plan, 74 A.D.2d 835; Morse v. Morse, 67 A.D.2d 750). Moreover, an order denying reargument is not appealable ( Matter of Carillo v. Axelrod, 83 A.D.2d 552). Mangano, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MONTALVO v. KEY INDUSTRIES
(Dec 19, 1983)