LEHAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for multiple counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.
Defendant objects to being limited on the scope of recross examination of one witness and redirect examination of another witness. However, we do not find the limitation to have been prejudicial. The questions that defendant was prevented from asking would not have adduced competent, relevant evidence.
AFFIRMED.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.