AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant, v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant,

MEMORANDUM.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Legislature in enacting section 674 of the Insurance Law adopted a new procedure which authorizes first-party benefits with a resulting equitable adjustment between insurers without the need for the formalities applicable to claims and lawsuits. In our view the comprehensive nature of the no-fault legislation and the absence therefrom of any requirement for compliance with section 50-e or 50-i of the General Municipal Law indicates a legislative intent that the provisions of the latter statutes should have no application to the statutory arbitration proceedings between insurers or self-insurers. In addition, we note that this interpretation is consistent with the opinion expressed by the Committee on Insurance Arbitration which is responsible for administering these arbitration proceedings (11 N.Y.CRR 65.10 [b] [1]). That opinion is entitled to great weight insofar as it represents the interpretation of the statute by an agency charged with implementing and enforcing it ( Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Care Center v Whalen, 46 N.Y.2d 979; see, also, Uniformed Firefighters Assn. v Beekman, 52 N.Y.2d 463, 472).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and KAYE concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. UTICA MUT. INS. CO
(Jan 10, 1984)