AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ANDREW HICKMAN, Petitioner, v. ROSLYN AIR NATIONAL GUARD et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 Exec. of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 15, 1982, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights determining that there was no probable cause to believe that respondent Roslyn Air National Guard was guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment, based on disability. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination by the State Division of Human Rights is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion (see Executive Law, § 298; State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 48 N.Y.2d 276; Matter of Mize v State Div. of Human Rights, 33 N.Y.2d 53, 57). Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HICKMAN v. ROSLYN AIR NATIONAL GUARD
(Feb 27, 1984)