AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JEANNE KELLY, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendant. FRANK H. SCHAEFER, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered September 9, 1983, which denied his motion to sever the third-party action and to dismiss the third-party complaint. ¶ Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, third-party action severed and third-party complaint dismissed. ¶ Respondent has no cause of action against appellant. Plaintiff in the main action has released appellant in exchange for substantial consideration. Therefore, as a settling tort-feasor with no potential liability for contribution, appellant is entitled to dismissal of the third-party complaint (see General Obligations Law, § 15-108, subd [b]; see, also, Lettiere v Martin Elevator Co., 62 A.D.2d 810, aff'd. 48 N.Y.2d 662; Mitchell v New York Hosp., 93 A.D.2d 832, mod on other grounds 61 N.Y.2d 208; Mielcarek v Knights, 50 A.D.2d 122). Niehoff, J.P., Rubin, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KELLY v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY
(Mar 12, 1984)