Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

EUGENE LITMAN, Appellant, v. PHYLLIS LITMAN, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 93 A.D.2d 695). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff's law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LITMAN v. LITMAN
(Mar 20, 1984)