Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BAUMAN et al, Petitioners on Re v. ew,

PER CURIAM

Dismissal by the Court of Appeals is reversed. Remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc., 296 Or. 653, 678 P.2d 1222 (1984).

PER CURIAM

The Court of Appeals dismissed petitioner's appeal because petitioner failed to serve notice of appeal upon the clerk of the trial court as required by ORS 19.023 (2)(b). In McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc., 296 Or. 653, 678 P.2d 1222 (1984), we hold that service of the notice of appeal on court reporters and clerks of trial courts, though required by ORS 19.023 (2), is not "jurisdictional" under ORS 19.033 (2). See also Spielman v. First Interstate Bank, 296 Or. 660, 678 P.2d 1226 (1984).

We therefore reverse the dismissal of the appeal and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAUMAN v. GITTELSOHN
(Mar 27, 1984)